--- On Tue, 4/20/10, Mossman, Paul (Paul) <[email protected]> wrote: > I had a quick look at the patch. Unless I'm missing > something, First/Last pool extension are the only > extension-related settings that will be treated with the new > int validation?
Yes, this is the case. > > Those seem OK to me, since I don't think we want the system > suggesting non-integer User IDs. > > > For the benefit of others, the JIRA we're discussing is > http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7663 Integer > validation in sipx: Tapestry validator(for integer) > accepting invalid input & not throwing validation > error. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
