Josh wrote:
> I still believe all those things should be kept for one 
> reason: sipX has the ability to provision external lines. 
> External as in not on a sipX system. Some of the settings 
> that are being suggested for removal may be crucial for 
> operation on an external system. 

There seem to be relatively few Line-specific Category 1/2 settings, compared 
to the number that are Phone-specific.

It should be possible to simplify Internal Lines, without removing anything 
from External Lines.

I'd like to think that we could have two types of External Lines: "sipXecs" 
(simplified) and "other" (complicated.)  But I think that would be outside the 
scope of XX-8261.


> One other thing should be 
> realized as well: while simplification is a good thing and 
> makes everyones lives easier, how much is too much? How much 
> do things get watered down before they become so basic that 
> monkeys banging on keyboards can make the system work.

Speaking as a monkey who bangs on a keyboard, I want a system basic enough that 
I can make it work.  :)

Seriously though, if we make the system easier to use, more people will deploy 
it.  That will benefit us all.

I hope we can find the right balance between simplicity and advanced 
capabilities.


> My opinion is don't take anything out, but consider 
> reorganizing the configuration and just throw all the 
> "unnecessary" stuff under an advanced area.

That is an option.  But it comes back to this layout-to-config mapping 
challenge.  Hopefully we can find a way to get the simplified layout we need, 
without breaking the existing config mapping.


> And please implement the polycom custom xml patch that Eric 
> Varsanyi wrote. It would be extremely useful for large 
> complex installations (like mine).

I admit, after my initial look I let these fall through the cracks.  My concern 
at the time was that they seemed to introduce a lot of Polycom-specific 
functionality outside the Polycom plug-in, which can't be used for other 
Phones.  I'll try and find time for a second look.


-Paul
[email protected]



_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to