Dale wrote:
> I can't comment about the strategy of telling the phone to 
> subscribe for MWI even if it doesn't have a mailbox, as that 
> is not my expertise.  But perhaps the matter should be reviewed.

I'm open to the change.  It would make the behaviour consistent with recently 
added XX-8496 Need Ability to Disable Subscribe to Presence per User.

A new "Subscribe to Presence" permission effectively dictates whether or not 
the user's phone configuration include the RLS URI, which will be SUBSCRIBE'd 
to if present.  Changing this permission requires re-sending the phone profile, 
before the phone will behave as desired.

BTW, these are good reasons to implement Dale's proposal: 
http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/msg23670.html


-Paul
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to