On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Tony Graziano <[email protected]> wrote: > FAX aliases should be kept separately. Deliberate FAX calls should not have > to pass by any type of auto detection. I think an auto detection is > warranted though. A fax alias should go to the ~~ff~ resource in every > event. There are a lot of firms that have different fax numbers that would > be DID's and they should be specified that they are in a fax ONLY situation. > Imagine the fax is sent to a normal number and the sender says I cant send > you a fax because your voicemail picks up. FAX DID's should NOT follow user > call forwarding, etc. So I think it would be easier to guarantee that a > specific call flow would not impact something that is specifically stated to > be a fax.
i see now. I was thinking out loud on #sipx and also thought we could auto detect, but it's impossible because other end is coming thru generic gateway and media hasn't started yet. > I also think at some point (soon) there ought to be a global lookup to see > where an alias exists in the system. Alias lookup, instead of relying on the > error "Already exists in system, then try to hunt for it...". Faxing adds > more aliases to the system, so it should also be searchable. I knew we shouldn't have listened to those kids asking for hide and seek aliases. would be very welcomed feature to address this, probably captured few different way in tracker already. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
