One last. When you said "call will not contain SRTP part", I assume you 
are pertaining to actual SDP from 200 towards 201?

you also said ".If I call 100 from 200 means SRTP part will be 
present".  I assume 100 means 201?

On 06/16/2011 05:15 PM, Kumaran wrote:
> Yes,Joegen your right
>
> Joegen Baclor wrote:
>> In the Enabled one the following is true?
>>
>> SRT Enabled:   True
>> Offer SRTP:   True
>> Require SRTP:  False
>>
>> There are three params.  Just trying to make sure we are in sync.
>>
>> On 06/16/2011 05:08 PM, Kumaran wrote:
>>>
>>>  Yes.200 is SRTP enabled phone and 201 is STRP disabled phone..So if 
>>> I call  either way there will no SRTP part.If I call 100 from 200 
>>> means SRTP part will be present..
>>>
>>> Joegen Baclor wrote:
>>>> So you are saying Offer SRTP doesn not mean what it says?  Phones 
>>>> do not offer SRTP with this set?
>>>>
>>>> On 06/16/2011 04:57 PM, Kumaran wrote:
>>>>> Hi Joegen,
>>>>>      Just now found out,if Require SRTP is disabled,Both the 
>>>>> scenario is
>>>>> working but the call will not contain SRTP part...either way from 
>>>>> 200 or 201
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Kumaran T
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Joegen Baclor wrote:
>>>>>> If you set on Offer SRTP and not Require SRTP, does scenario 1 
>>>>>> and 3 work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/16/2011 02:23 PM, Kumaran wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>       I'm testing SRTP for 4.4 in the 13th June build.George had
>>>>>>> attached a new Polycom file " phone.xml and phone.properties in 
>>>>>>> Jira
>>>>>>> (XX-9675)<http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9675>which I have
>>>>>>> replaced these files in /etc/sipxpbx/polycom..After replacing I
>>>>>>> enabled the following option Enable SRTP
>>>>>>> Offer SRTP
>>>>>>> Require SRTP
>>>>>>> AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 for phones to enable SRTP function..Then
>>>>>>> after enabling STRP in one phone  I'm finding 2 different
>>>>>>> scenario(1&3)....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Scenario:
>>>>>>>   2 users 200 and 201
>>>>>>> 200=Polycom 550 =0004f21ed193
>>>>>>> 201=Polycom 550= 0004f21ebe81
>>>>>>> I tested in following Order.So I if any trying maintain the same 
>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>   Scenario:1         1.200 user -Polycom 550 -SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>       2.201 user -Polycom 550 -No SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>       3.Call 201 from 200 --Call is going to user 201.SRTP is 
>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>> Fine...Lock symbol is present in both the phone and
>>>>>>> AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 line is present in the SDP part
>>>>>>>       4.Call 200 from 201----Call going to IVR(Owner of the EXT 
>>>>>>> 200 is
>>>>>>> not available)
>>>>>>>   Scenario:2
>>>>>>>       1.200 user -Polycom 550-SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>       2.201 user -Polycom 550-SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>       3.Call 201 from 200 --Call is going to user 201.SRTP is 
>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>> Fine...Lock symbol is present in both the phone and
>>>>>>> AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 line is present in the SDP part
>>>>>>>       4.Call 200 from 201--Call is going to user 200.SRTP is 
>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>> Fine...Lock symbol is present in both the phone and
>>>>>>> AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 line is present in the SDP part
>>>>>>>   Scenario:3
>>>>>>>       1.200 user -Polycom 550 -SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>       2.201 user -Polycom 550 -No SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>       3.Call either way from 200 to 201 or 201 to 200 ---Call is 
>>>>>>> going
>>>>>>> to IVR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had attached MAC-sipx-sip.cfg for above three scenario.There is
>>>>>>> difference in MAC-sipx-sip.cfg for first and third scenario for 201
>>>>>>> user phone(which having same setting for both the scenario)in SRTP
>>>>>>> part.The same behavior is seen to other user also if we try in 
>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>> order...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Venkateshwaran T
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> sipx-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> sipx-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sipx-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/

Reply via email to