Hi Joegen,
   There is something wrong in Null and 0...

Kumaran wrote:
>
>     Yes,I'm pertaining to actual SDP from 200 towards 201.If calling 
> 100 from 200 means I'm Calling AA from 200 and here 100 doesn't mean 
> 201 its AA
>
> Joegen Baclor wrote:
>> One last. When you said "call will not contain SRTP part", I assume 
>> you are pertaining to actual SDP from 200 towards 201?
>>
>> you also said ".If I call 100 from 200 means SRTP part will be 
>> present".  I assume 100 means 201?
>>
>> On 06/16/2011 05:15 PM, Kumaran wrote:
>>> Yes,Joegen your right
>>>
>>> Joegen Baclor wrote:
>>>> In the Enabled one the following is true?
>>>>
>>>> SRT Enabled:   True
>>>> Offer SRTP:   True
>>>> Require SRTP:  False
>>>>
>>>> There are three params.  Just trying to make sure we are in sync.
>>>>
>>>> On 06/16/2011 05:08 PM, Kumaran wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Yes.200 is SRTP enabled phone and 201 is STRP disabled phone..So 
>>>>> if I call  either way there will no SRTP part.If I call 100 from 
>>>>> 200 means SRTP part will be present..
>>>>>
>>>>> Joegen Baclor wrote:
>>>>>> So you are saying Offer SRTP doesn not mean what it says?  Phones 
>>>>>> do not offer SRTP with this set?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/16/2011 04:57 PM, Kumaran wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Joegen,
>>>>>>>      Just now found out,if Require SRTP is disabled,Both the 
>>>>>>> scenario is
>>>>>>> working but the call will not contain SRTP part...either way 
>>>>>>> from 200 or 201
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Kumaran T
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joegen Baclor wrote:
>>>>>>>> If you set on Offer SRTP and not Require SRTP, does scenario 1 
>>>>>>>> and 3 work?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 06/16/2011 02:23 PM, Kumaran wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>       I'm testing SRTP for 4.4 in the 13th June build.George had
>>>>>>>>> attached a new Polycom file " phone.xml and phone.properties 
>>>>>>>>> in Jira
>>>>>>>>> (XX-9675)<http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9675>which I have
>>>>>>>>> replaced these files in /etc/sipxpbx/polycom..After replacing I
>>>>>>>>> enabled the following option Enable SRTP
>>>>>>>>> Offer SRTP
>>>>>>>>> Require SRTP
>>>>>>>>> AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 for phones to enable SRTP function..Then
>>>>>>>>> after enabling STRP in one phone  I'm finding 2 different
>>>>>>>>> scenario(1&3)....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Scenario:
>>>>>>>>>   2 users 200 and 201
>>>>>>>>> 200=Polycom 550 =0004f21ed193
>>>>>>>>> 201=Polycom 550= 0004f21ebe81
>>>>>>>>> I tested in following Order.So I if any trying maintain the 
>>>>>>>>> same order
>>>>>>>>>   Scenario:1         1.200 user -Polycom 550 -SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>>>       2.201 user -Polycom 550 -No SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>>>       3.Call 201 from 200 --Call is going to user 201.SRTP is 
>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>> Fine...Lock symbol is present in both the phone and
>>>>>>>>> AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 line is present in the SDP part
>>>>>>>>>       4.Call 200 from 201----Call going to IVR(Owner of the 
>>>>>>>>> EXT 200 is
>>>>>>>>> not available)
>>>>>>>>>   Scenario:2
>>>>>>>>>       1.200 user -Polycom 550-SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>>>       2.201 user -Polycom 550-SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>>>       3.Call 201 from 200 --Call is going to user 201.SRTP is 
>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>> Fine...Lock symbol is present in both the phone and
>>>>>>>>> AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 line is present in the SDP part
>>>>>>>>>       4.Call 200 from 201--Call is going to user 200.SRTP is 
>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>> Fine...Lock symbol is present in both the phone and
>>>>>>>>> AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 line is present in the SDP part
>>>>>>>>>   Scenario:3
>>>>>>>>>       1.200 user -Polycom 550 -SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>>>       2.201 user -Polycom 550 -No SRTP Enabled
>>>>>>>>>       3.Call either way from 200 to 201 or 201 to 200 ---Call 
>>>>>>>>> is going
>>>>>>>>> to IVR.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I had attached MAC-sipx-sip.cfg for above three scenario.There is
>>>>>>>>> difference in MAC-sipx-sip.cfg for first and third scenario 
>>>>>>>>> for 201
>>>>>>>>> user phone(which having same setting for both the scenario)in 
>>>>>>>>> SRTP
>>>>>>>>> part.The same behavior is seen to other user also if we try in 
>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>> order...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Venkateshwaran T
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> sipx-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> sipx-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> sipx-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/

Reply via email to