On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Damian Krzeminski <[email protected]> wrote: > M. Ranganathan wrote: >> 2009/4/1 Grant Lang <[email protected]>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I have a problem with Dialling Rules and Gateway combinations. >>> >>> I am using an ITSP with multiple numbers, thus multiple gateways to the same >>> ITSP. >>> >>> This is required as the different numbers are for different cities/regions >>> and lets me take advantage of LCR (Least Cost Routing). >>> So for example if I have an Auckland number and a Wellington number with my >>> ITSP I end up with two gateways registering to the same ITSP. That part >>> works perfectly. >>> >>> I create two Dialling Rules, one for Auckland (09) and one for Wellington >>> (04) and attach the appropriate Gateway. >>> >>> The problem is because 'host' is essentially the same the Dialling Rules >>> take no notice of the Gateway associated with the Rule and instead use the >>> Gateway at the top of the Gateway List. >>> >>> If you then modify one of the Gateways it moves to the bottom of the list, >>> thus changing the order and then the Dialling Rules use the other gateway. >>> >>> I am sure this is not supposed to be like this and perhaps it is a bug? >> >> I believe that is a known limitation in our dial plan implementation. >> The limitation is that the user part that is in the From header is >> dependent upon the dial plan domain setting. In other words, for a >> given ITSP proxy domain you can have only one dial plan. >> If it is possible for you to differentiate your different regions by >> ITSP domain, you can accommodate your requirements. Then for each >> domain, set up a different dial plan. >> >>> I would like to know if this is a feature or if it isn't possible to have >> >> It is a current limitation. >> >>> multiple gateways registered with the same ITSP. >> >> Only if you can distinguish by ITSP domain at present. >> >> > > I am not sure if I understand what the limitation you are talking about is > but 'From' header should not have anything to do with how call is routed.
I believe he is running into this one : http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XECS-2283 > > I was always possible in sipX to route calls to 2 different gateways based > on the dial screen. The fact that those gateways register with the same > ITSP does not change that. > > Let's see these fallbackrules.xml before we jump to any conclusions. > D. > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users > -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
