On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:03 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 17:22 +0700, Boy Aidil Sjam wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > I solved the problem. > > Early, I configured the gateway using full hostname.domain.name to the other > > gateway, even changed the address with IP address, but the result still the > > same. > > Then after I changed the gateway address using SRV, suddenly it work. > > I'm not sure I followed that, but if you like it... > > > Well, I think that's why sipXecs very dependent with DNS SRV. > > DNS SRV is the primary mechanism for HA. > > > > Next step, testing between 2 server with both server behind NAT. > > If you mean putting each server behind a different NAT, that is not > something that we've tested at all, and it's not a supported > configuration.
Sorry - I may be getting my threads mixed up. What isn't supported or tested is having two members of an HA cluster behind two different NATs. If what you have is two different systems (different SIP domain names) configured to talk to each other via site-to-site links, being behind two different NATs can be made to work (with the usual NAT hassles, of course). _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
