Scott, Can you clarify this? Lets say server A is behind a NAT but in the DMZ. A new branch office will have server B also behind a NAT. You're saying they must be in different SIP domains? HA isn't available without VPN or similar connectivity?
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] on behalf of Scott Lawrence Sent: Fri 6/12/2009 10:25 AM To: Boy Aidil Sjam Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Interconnection 2 sipXecs - solved On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:03 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote: > If you mean putting each server behind a different NAT, that is not > something that we've tested at all, and it's not a supported > configuration. Sorry - I may be getting my threads mixed up. What isn't supported or tested is having two members of an HA cluster behind two different NATs. If what you have is two different systems (different SIP domain names) configured to talk to each other via site-to-site links, being behind two different NATs can be made to work (with the usual NAT hassles, of course). _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
