> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Petersen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 4:06 PM > To: Saint, David (CAR:9D60); [email protected] > Subject: RE: [sipx-users] User expectation for call forward > functionality > > Huh, very interesting conundrum indeed... > > My first response was that Functionality "B" should be the > way it works... > but after thinking about it for a second I'm not so sure. > > If 202 rings an actual phone at a persons desk and the owner > of extension > 202 has control over their phone (or is the one that has to > hear it ring) I am inclined to say that they should have the > final word in the matter??? > > I know that if I set my ringer to ring no more than 10sec I > would probably have a valid reason for that and wouldn't want > others messing with my settings... > > On the other hand an admin might have a perfectly logical > reason to trump the user that keeps screwing with the > settings (situation specific I'm sure). > > How much work would it be to add a checkbox that acts as an > override? So the default behavior would be Functionality "A" > specified in the previous message but an admin could still > override to achieve Functionality "B"? > > Jonathan Petersen <--- Likes to have cake and eat it too ;) > > Ontra LLC > www.ontraonline.com >
It would be possible to add new administration to control this functionality but that would be non-trivial. Looks like it would require a new jira issue. There's also the case to consider of Hunt Group calls ringing the phone for longer periods of time. If there was new configuration added perhaps it should be a per-user limit on ring time for any call type. Dave. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
