Scott Lawrence wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 17:41 -0500, Picher, Michael wrote: >> Well, no but good try... :-) >> >> It's the same IP as the real gateway definition... I just want to >> pre-pend something different. >> >> I wonder if you're on to something though. I could try some fake DNS >> entries so that they have different gateway host names. > > Creating multiple gateways that have different 'name' values in > sipXconfig but the same IP address doesn't really create a difference in > the proxy/routing decisions, because those decisions are based on what > you put in the 'address' box. >
That's not true: I *know* that having multiple gateways with the same IP can create a different *rules.xml (and by definition different routing decisions) specifically when you used different gateway prefix or different location for such gateways. Let's concentrate on *rules.xml for now and forget about how they were generated. It seems to me that they should do what Mikes want (callers from Florence and Ohio should result in different prefixes). If that does not work there is a problem in location specific routing, right? [...] _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
