HA is not a master/slave. It is a Master/distributed. So there's on chief,
but the distributed servers can be assigned roles.

I don't think this thread is applicable to the subleties of this.

Here's a quick overview:

http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/High-Availability_Installation

A few things have changed in 4.0, but the pictures help to understand the
roles you can assign.

Voicemail for 500 users on one server, voicemail for another 500 on second
server. The voicemail server has to specified when setting up the user
currently. Both can do registrations (in case one is not reachable). You can
specify the roles servers have (CDR, Siptrunking, etc.).

Mike Picher's book has a great chapter on how to do a HA install.

http://www.packtpub.com/building-enterprise-ready-telephony-systems-with-sipxecs-4-0/book



On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:06 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote:

> > or maybe both at priority 1 and see if the registrations balance. There's
> > been a lot of talk on how to do this kind of thing on the list lately.
>
> > Your two sipx installs perhaps need to be in HA so that if one fails, it
> > will continue to allow registrations and calls.
>
> This is the part I'm not clear on yet.
> I thought HA was adding servers to the first one, but they would all be
> part of the same
> single install, and NAT IP.
>
> Or, is there an HA setup where I could run more than one sipx instance and
> keep them
> synchronized so that users could hit either WAN to register/make calls?
>
> I very badly need to use multiple WANs to raise the level of availability
> and reliability.
>
> > I think because the initial registration time needs to expire. Even
> though
> > it might register upon startup and deregister when shutdown on the PC,
> the
> > "state" has a ttl (time to live) involved that has not expired at the
> > firewall. I don't think it should matter.
>
> I was wondering if there might be a setting which I could lower or if it
> might be best to
> keep it a bit higher, as it is. I suspect this is a good thing so that idle
> phones don't
> think they have lost connection if something goes away for very short
> periods of time.
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to