On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 14:05 -0500, Scott Lawrence wrote: > Actually, I think that's an illusion. I've looked more closely and > repeated the unit test of the C++ Url class and it seems to work. > > I think the illusion is created when the logs are merged - the first > message that shows as incorrect is the one sent from the proxy to the > bridge. That message appears in both logs, but only one of those copies > is put into the siptrace xml file. The frameid element for that message > is: > > <frameId>11 sipxbridge.xml:16965 sipxbridge.xml:17015 sipXproxy.xml:655481 > sipXproxy.xml:655496</frameId> > > my guess is that the order there implies that the copy actually used is > the one from the sipxbridge.xml file.
There is also the possibility that "caller id" processing is mangling the display name, and that is only activated if the request is sent to sipXbridge. But I'm pretty sure that your diagnosis about merging is the right explanation. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
