Now that you ask, I'll elaborate a bit more.

1. There is often a need for department heads to compare their long distance bill with individual callers within a department. Our long distance provider uses PIN numbers on the telco side, so each department has a specific PIN number and get a long distance bill based on that PIN. It would be nice for department heads to be able to log into the web portal and retrieve their departments CDR's (group based?) for the billing period.

2. The current CDR, when used with park, MOH, directed call pickup, etc. etc. is an absolute mess. It's almost impossible to get any useful information out of it. One of the reasons for this is we use polycom phones and an outbound SIP trunk to dial 4 digit to our Meridian Option 61c via DMS100 PRI so all of those numbers appear as external outbound and inbound calls in the CDR. Perhaps a minumum number length threshold when pulling CDR records for a report, or even better, perhaps a nested call path within the detailed report, such as:

Step
From
To
Start
Total Duration
Duration
Action
Status
1
5551234567
4321
15-Jan-2010 9:01:15 AM
1 minute, 43 seconds
Call Pickup by 4123
Completed
2
5551234567
4123


23 seconds
Placed On Hold
Success
3
5551234567
~~mh~


20 seconds
Retrieved From Hold
Success
4
5551234567
4123


15 seconds
Transfered to 84321
Success
5
5551234567
84321


45 seconds
Call ended by remote party
Success
1
4123
5553211236
15-Jan-2010 10:32:14 AM
5 minutes, 22 seconds


Completed
2
4123
5553211236


5 minutes, 22 seconds
Call ended by 4123
Success
1
5556344358
4987
15-Jan-2010 11:01:42 AM
1 minute, 10 seconds

No answer, sent to voicemail
Completed
2
5556344359
~~vm~4987


1 minute, 10 seconds
Call ended by remote party
Success


And, in addition, a simpler report for the department heads, preferably sortable by inbound and outbound calls:

From
To
Start
Total Duration
Last Action
Status
5551234567
4321
15-Jan-2010 9:01:15 AM
1 minute, 43 seconds
Call ended by remote party
Success
4123
5553211236
15-Jan-2010 10:32:14 AM
5 minutes, 22 seconds
Call ended by 4123
Success
5556344359
4987
15-Jan-2010 11:01:42 AM
1 minute, 10 seconds
Call ended by remote party
Success

Right now, as I said, it's a bit of a jumbled mess and not really in a usable state. I'm sure this could be done or at least improved upon.

Raymond Dans wrote:
Josh,
   Noticed your request for better CDRs/Reports.  Can you be a bit more specific.  A considerable amount of new information has been added to the CDR records in 4.2 as well as new/changes to reports.  Is there something in particular about a report that you'd like see?
 



Raymond Dans | Software Engineer| Avaya | 3500 Carling Avenue| Ottawa, Ontario K2H-8E9|
Voice/Fax/Mobile: 613-763-3941/613-763-7742 | [email protected]


Intelligent Communications avaya.com

[ Please consider the environment before printing this email ]

 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Patten
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 5:09 PM
To: Lawrence, Scott AVAYA (BL60:9D30)
Cc: sipXecs users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Simplify, Simplify, Simplify

Be ready for a mailing list flood :-P

Here are a few things, and I'm sure some if not most are already in motion and some of them may not fall within your guideline, call me out on them if they're out of the scope of your request:
  • Advanced audiocodes gateway configurations, such as manipulation tables.
  • Better CDR's. Right now I'm having to get our on-staff programmer to write me out a parser to sift through all the CDR records to generate a comprehensive report.
  • Voice notification of new voicemails, not just email. Some people don't have data or SMS on their phones.
  • Auto Attendant Dial by name directory is currently just bad, namely due to the 10 second delay issue.
  • make backup and restore a little more comprehensive, such as making sure all SSL certs are in order.
  • Wildcard SSL certificates.
  • Bring back the remote call forwarding restriction, sometimes there is a need to keep certain users from forwarding calls off-site.
  • Hunt group pickup code shortcut. A speed dial has to be used for hunt group pickup because users can't remember the entire *78XXXX pickup code.
  • Call pickup/hunt group pickup permissions. It is somewhat unnerving that anyone can set up a presence monitor on any extension they want to and intercept their calls.
  • Allow different alarms to be sent to different email addresses
  • (sipXconfig) Allow more than 20 phones/users to be displayed at one time.
  • For end users: allow a different phonebook in the web portal than on the phone so the entire directory can be searched in the web portal but only a small departmental subset will be seen on the phone.
  • Better dial plans. The current ones are a bit watered down.
  • Transferring calls to park requires three button presses on Polycom handsets (transfer, blind, park button). Could this possibly be whittled down?
  • If a Jabra or Plantronics headset with EHS adapters is used on a phone with BLF then every time a BLF button shows a monitored extension to be ringing, the headset also rings. Polycom and Jabra have basically ignored me on this. I am almost 100% positive this has to do with the "alerting" state with enhanced BLF.
  • I've had to write EFK's for Intercom, Group Page, Transfer To Voicemail, and Blind Transfer on Polycom phones. Perhaps these could be included by default and turned on/off at the group phone level?
  • Allow for a pickup time shorter than 1 second for *78XXXX call pickup. Users are used to the call immediately being picked up on older systems. I have trained users to wait for the short "beep" sound but sometimes they forget :-(
  • Voicemail quotas so the packrats will get rid of voicemails from 5 years ago or archive them to their computer
  • 64 bit CentOS installation ISO.
  • Polycom config overrides upload. It's frustrating after a firmware update having annoyed users because their ringtone, background, etc. got reset.
  • Troubleshooting has got to become a bit easier. A scrolling CLI would definitely help.
OK, that seems to be more than just a few. I'm sure there are more that I'm not thinking about right now. I'm really glad to hear Avaya is committed to the project.
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676

On 1/22/2010 3:23 PM, Scott Lawrence wrote:
As we begin to home in on release 4.2, we're starting to formulate plans
for what comes next...

First, I want to reassure the community - Avaya is very much committed
both to the SCS commercial product (see roadmap announcements made this
week), and to leading, contributing to, and materially supporting the
sipXecs open source project.  There most assuredly will be versions
beyond 4.2, and we're committed to making them better with every
release.

Which brings me to the Subject of this request for community input.  One
of the major strategic goals of the release after 4.2 is to make sipXecs
simpler.  Simpler to install, simpler to administer, simpler for end
users to use.  Nice goal, huh?  Motherhood is good, Apple Pie is very
good, and Simplicity is great - I'm glad we all agree :-)

Now comes the challenging part - what is simplicity?  We'd like to hear
what the community thinks... 

Specifically, what are your top 5 suggestions for how to simplify
sipXecs?  For this thread, we are _not_ asking for what your favorite
missing power telephony features are (we'll do some of those too) - we
want to know how to make the features we've got easier to understand and
use.  What are the things that you have to jump through hoops to do
(especially if you have to do them more than once)?  What are the things
you constantly have to explain to users?  What are the things you know
how to do but it's just a little irritating ever time you have to do
them?  Try to think back to your first experiences - what was hard
before you knew what you were doing (newbies - this is your chance to
jump in and contribute even before you know what you're doing!) ?  

This is not like those dumb Microsoft advertisements where one doofus
after another takes credit for Windows 7 (really - would anyone actually
want to take _credit_ for Windows?) - we really want to know.

I'm going to suggest one more thing for this thread - that developers
just read and not post.  In particular, in this thread: don't explain
that something our users think is hard is actually easy, or tell them
why it's hard, or suggest how we might fix it, or chime in here and now
with your ideas.  We'll have our turns to process all this more actively
later and elsewhere - this thread is about listening to our users pain.
Hear, be inspired, and get motivated. 




_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
  

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to