Sorry poor choice of words - I meant redundant configuration so if the wan goes down they can still send/receive calls via local pstn lines.
>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 2/19/2010 4:04 PM >>> >>> On 2/19/2010 2:29 PM, Jason Mitchell wrote: > Some background: > * We have 8 remote sites and 1 headquarters > * Each site has its own phone system > * 7 of the remote sites have t1 connectivity used for data only and are > pretty much pegged throughout the day and night > * 1 Site is across the street and we have fiber connectivity > * The biggest remote site has 50 handsets, headquarters has about 400 > handsets. > * We have two pri's at headquarters and two pri's across the street. The > remote sites either just have pstn lines or centrex > * We have two call centers (maximum of 10 agents each) > > The plan: > * Collapse the entire phone system back to our headquarters > * Have HA servers at HQ > * Have onside servers at each site synching to HQ > * Use Patton or Audiocodes gateways > * Use Polycom 335 as the standard user phone, Polycom 650 with 14 key > expansion for secretaries, and Polycom IP 6000 for conference rooms > * Extension dial for each site > * Call routing (save on long distance) > > I don't believe the 335 is supported, yet. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08597.html What method are you planning to use for 'Have onside servers at each site synching to HQ' -Matthew _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
