On 2/19/2010 3:14 PM, Jason Mitchell wrote:
> Sorry poor choice of words - I meant redundant configuration so if the wan
> goes down they can still send/receive calls via local pstn lines.
>
I am far (I mean really far) from an expert, but as I worked out every
possible scenario, I was not able to find a perfect fit that had my sipx
server centralized at our HQ, but still allowed our remote sites to have
a relatively seamless transition to using emergency POTS lines. I was
only concerned with outbound over POTS, but I still ran into an issue of
some sort in every type configuration scenario I played with.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
