On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 09:57 -0600, Josh Patten wrote:
> We're talking about users that barely know how to check their email
> here. The personal auto attendant  concept gets me blank stares every
> time I talk about it to end users. If they're savvy enough to use that
> then more power to them :-P
> 
> I agree, Scott, that this should not be a "technical solution to a
> managerial problem" but telling that to elected officials and
> department heads doesn't fly. Our Meridian Option 61c is set up to
> only allow internal forwarding to all users and that's the way they
> want it so eventually I'm going to have to be able to accommodate that
> feature. If the original "forward calls external" permission could
> easily be put back in then it would be greatly appreciated.

File a New Feature request for this.

Unfortunately, it's not quite as simple as putting back the old feature,
but it's certainly doable.  We're going to be looking at how to
simplify/clarify lots of configuration elements in the next few months,
and this is just a configuration problem.

To respond to the AA question - in terms of the internal sipXecs
security, anything you set up through forwarding or the AA is executed
with your permissions, so they are for all intents and purposes the
same.


_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to