Clouds drop rain on parades..........
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:16 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and VMware? gimme a cloud version! On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:10 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: I was just throwing something out there for discussion. One of the major components of Sipx appears to be working on becoming more compatible with virtualization. Hopefully sipx as a whole can. I would think one of the major questions would be how is avaya selling the paid version of the product? If it is designed to run on any hardware, I would think they would be interested in making it work in a virtual environment. If it is designed to run on their hardware, then I wouldn't think any effort would be made towards making it more compatible with vmware. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile _____ From: Tony Graziano <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:47:35 -0400 To: Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)<[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and VMware? Yes, but you cant get that to stay (assuming it works) unless you have your own build with it stated. Once you make one change, it sends the configs to freeswitch (sixconfig does) like any other service, and will overwrite this "-vm" flag. If it honestly does something, it should be requested as an "experimental" feature from sipxconfig anyway! On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) <[email protected]> wrote: I found at last a mention of the startup flag for freeswitch: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2010-March/054412.htm l -vm is the actual startup flag for freeswitch. I haven't been able to find a lot of info on exactly what it does. Having the same letters as the abbreviation for voicemail has made searching a bit difficult. On 4/23/2010 1:54 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: There is a whitepaper I saw (hat showed a more elaborate config to get timing, etc. Right for a cisco voice implementation on vmware. Very detailed. If I find it I'll shout. ============================ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: [email protected]<[email protected]> Sent: Fri Apr 23 14:50:17 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and VMware? I can't find any info at the moment on it, but I believe there is an option in freeswitch to configure it to use something besides the cpu clock on virtual machines. I'm not sure if that would be applicable or help here. I'm all for anything that can be done to make sipx work properly on VMWare. I know Cisco is certifying their product for VMWare. On 4/23/2010 11:52 AM, Picher, Michael wrote: You'll have to do some testing with load. With not much of a load they usually work fine... I've built many on KVM and on VMWare. I think with esx 4 at a minimum you'll want to dedicate 1 or two processors just to that virtual host for best operation. If you are going to operate an install of any size your may not truly know performance issues until you go live. Under load, performance problems will raise their head in the voicemail, MOH, ivr, acd and possibly SIP trunking. All of that being said, it's still a bit of an unknown with the new voicemail subsystem in 4.2. In theory it should work better. Mike *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Francis Tinio *Sent:* Friday, April 23, 2010 12:30 PM *To:* Ken Fulmer *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] sipX 4.2 and VMware? we're running some installations in vmware esxi. no issues so far. On Apr 23, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Ken Fulmer wrote: Are there any known issues with running sipX 4.2 on VMware? As I understand it, there were problems with earlier releases and VMware. Thanks, Ken Fulmer _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/ -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec. -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
