On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 08:22 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Scott Lawrence <[email protected]> > wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 20:10 +0000, [email protected] > wrote: > > > . One of the major components of Sipx appears to be working > on > > becoming more compatible with virtualization. > > > ... and that was one of the motivations for moving more of our > media > services to freeswitch in 4.2. > > Testing and providing feedback on operation in various > virtualization > environments (under realistic loads) would be a terrific way > for the > community to contribute. Rest assured that what is learned > will be > used. > > (Avaya sales strategy is not something that we'll discuss on > this list) > > Does it make sense to consider adding the -vm switch in sipxconfig as > "experimental" so it can be properly tested?
I'm not familiar with where that goes, but it should be possible to just edit it into the files in a specific installation and test it - we don't need to check anything in for that. _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
