I may have spoke too soon...

I see you can load dd-wrt on the actiontek...

http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Supported_Devices#Actiontec

<http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Supported_Devices#Actiontec>Question
is what revision and is it in the supported devices list or on the HCL list,
only rev a,b,c,d are supported it seems.

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Tony Graziano <[email protected]
> wrote:

> You might find your internal firewall may have an issue as well passing
> audio if it cannot do symmetrical NAT (which I doubt).
>
> So once you get DNS setup where the phones will register you should try
> making a call and if you get no (or one-way audio), you should stop and
> address the firewall piece.
>
> If it were me (and it is not), I would see if I could set the verizon modem
> to "bridged" mode and put a compatible firewall in. I say this because in
> looking through the fios devices of that model, I see nothing which
> encourages me that this is something that has the guts to work in the way
> that is needed, but is fine for a remote site.
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Paul Scheepens <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Gary Luca <[email protected]> wrote on 15-07-2010 05:02:40:
>>
>> > Ok. So I just got a whole TON of replies with questions to answer.  Here
>> goes:
>> >
>> > Nathaniel...
>> >
>> > DNS/DHCP at the remote site are handled by the Westell ADSL2 modem.
>> >  It deals out just IP, Subnet mask, gateway (itself) and DNS (also
>> > itself).  DNS relays to what I imagine are Verizon DNS servers.  The
>> > relavent DNS records on the local network (in Microsoft DNS Server)
>> > are as follows:
>> >
>> > spadafora4senate.com
>> >      mal-pbx (A) 172.16.17.45
>> >      spadafora4senate.com (NAPTR) [2][0][S][SIP+D2U]<Reg Exp>[_sip._
>> > udp.spadafora4senate.com.]
>> >      spadafora4senate.com (NAPTR) [2][0][S][SIP+D2T]<Reg Exp>[_sip._
>> > tcp.spadafora4senate.com.]
>>
>> As far as I know you can skip the NAPTR's, I have been running without
>> them for years.
>>
>> >
>> > _tcp.spadafora4senate.com
>> >      _sip (SRV) [200][1][5060] mal-pbx.spadafora4senate.com.
>> >      _sips (SRV) [300][1][5060] mal-pbx.spadafora4senate.com.
>> >
>> > _udp.spadafora4senate.com
>> >      _sip (SRV) [100][1][5060] mal-pbx.spadafora4senate.com.
>> >
>>
>> These are the DNS records you use on the central site, that's why your
>> Polycoms work locally.
>> You need something similar on the remote site, that's what's missing.
>>
>> > Doug...
>> >
>> > Thank you for the link regarding FTP.  Do you know of any place
>> > where I can find detailed instructions on how precisely to configure
>> > sipX for whatever it needs in order for FTP to work for phone
>> > provisioning?  On the local network I use TFTP, which I don't mind
>> > because it is a secure network.  For the REMOTES i'd rather use FTP
>> > as it incorporates authentication.
>> >
>> > Tony...
>> >
>> > I actually thought it WAS a DNS issue for a while.  I looked through
>> > the wiki and everything I could find about DNS considerations for
>> > sipX and nothing mentioned anything about external DNS (that I could
>> > see).  So, being fairly new to the SIP world, I assumed the only
>> > resolution that had to be done by the remote phone was in regards to
>> > the Outgoing Proxy.  I figured it just contacted the Outgoing Proxy
>> > and that acted as the middle man for everything, not requiring the
>> > phone to have to do any other DNS resolution or anything.  The
>> > proxy, being on the local network, would resolve everything to the
>> > local DNS and just make everything work for the remote user.  It
>> > seemed to make sense, but my limited knowledge of the inner workings
>> > of the relationship between the remote, the proxy, and the registrar
>> > left me without a DEFINITE answer.
>> >
>> > So at that point, with the phones just NOT registering at all, it
>> > was clear that it could be ANYTHING.  My sipX config could be wrong.
>> >  I could have screwed something up with the NAT traversal features.
>> >  It could have been a DNS issue.  It could have been a phone issue.
>> >  So I had to narrow it down.  That's when I installed x-lite.  And
>> > within like a MINUTE, I had it connected to sipX and able to make
>> > and receive calls.  There was NO VPN involved or anything.  Just
>> > straight over the internet through a NAT on both ends.  Here are the
>> > settings I used:
>> >
>> > General
>> >      User ID: x703
>> >      Domain: spadafora4senate.com
>> >      Password: *********
>> >      Display name: Gary Luca
>> >      Authorization name: [blank]
>> >
>> >      Register with domain and receive calls: [checked]
>> >      Send outbound via: Proxy - Address: myhostname.no-ip.org
>>
>> Get x-lite working without "Send outbound via Proxy".
>> By enabling "Send outbound via Proxy" x-lite will register via the A
>> record of myhostname.no-ip.org.
>> If "Send outbound via Proxy" is disabled x-lite will try to resolve the
>> SRV records for spadafora4senate.com (or was that spada4a4senate.com ;-)
>> This is also the method the Polycom's will use.
>>
>> Now you need to create the corresponding SRV records somewhere so that
>> x-lite and polycoms on the remote site can register via SRV records:
>>
>> _tcp.spadafora4senate.com
>>       _sip (SRV) [200][1][5060] myhostname.no-ip.org
>>       _sips (SRV) [300][1][5060] myhostname.no-ip.org
>>
>> _udp.spadafora4senate.com
>>       _sip (SRV) [100][1][5060] myhostname.no-ip.org
>>
>> This can be done by defining the SRV records on your internet dns-server
>> (ISP)
>> or setting up a DNS at the remote site or ... I don't know your setup
>> enough to give the best advise.
>>
>> >      Dial plan: #1\a\a.T;match=1;prestrip=2;
>> >
>> > Topology
>> >      IP Address: Use local IP address
>> >      STUN Server: Discover server
>> >      Enable ICE: [unchecked]
>> >
>> >      Manually specify range: [unchecked]
>>
>> I think this is the port range (don't have x-lite running), normally the
>> port range
>> is limited to keep the firewall rules simple and not too open.
>> It is normally limited to ports 30000-31000, a smaller range is also
>> possible.
>>
>> >
>> > Presence
>> >      Mode: Peer-to-peer
>> >      Poll time: 300
>> >      Refresh interval: 3600
>> >
>> > Transport
>> >      Signaling transport: UDP
>> >
>> > Advanced
>> >      Reregister every: 3600 seconds
>> >      Minimum time: 20 seconds
>> >      Maximum time: 1800 seconds
>> >
>> >      Enable session timers: [unchecked]
>> >
>> >      Send SIP keep-alives: [checked]
>> >      Use rport: [checked]
>> >      Send outgoing request directly to target: [checked]
>> >
>> > So if what I assuming about the proxy being the middle man is wrong
>> > and what you are saying about the remote needing to resolve the SRVs
>> > itself is correct, then I have absolutely NO idea why x-lite is
>> > working.  But it is.  If you want to email me directly (outside of
>> > the list), I'll even set you up with a test user on my system so you
>> > can configure x-lite or any other manually configured phone (soft or
>> > hard) and evaluate the results.
>> >
>> > Dale...
>> >
>> > The phone doesn't list in the Registrations page. On the phone
>> > interface, the little "phone" icon next to each of the two line
>> > buttons is "hollow" indicating that the line did not register (not
>> > sure how familiar you are with the Polycom display).  Calls to the
>> > phone fail to make it ring.
>> >
>> > Thank you all.  Let me know if I can clarify anything further.  I
>> > look forward to your thoughts
>> >
>> > -G
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Gary J. Luca Jr.
>> >
>> > 781-333-8087
>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/garylukes
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>> > Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>> > sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ======================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> sip: [email protected]
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> sip: [email protected]
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
> Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
>
>


-- 
======================
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
sip: [email protected]
Fax: 434.984.8431

Email: [email protected]

LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
Telephone: 434.984.8426
sip: [email protected]
Fax: 434.984.8427

Helpdesk Contract Customers:
http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/

Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas?
Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to