I have now confirmed this is not a problem with the gateways. I posted a 
ticket here:
http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8652
Even with firmware 3.1.3revC this is still happening.

Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676


On 7/16/2010 10:29 AM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> So the question still remains if it happens with firmware 3.13RevC.
>
> Its the polycom complaining... 3.2 aint all that.
> ============================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]<[email protected]>
> Sent: Fri Jul 16 11:27:35 2010
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Help with Patton gateway
>
> EDIT - This also seems to be occuring with my Audiocodes gateways as
> well so apparently it's not isolated just to the Patton gateways.
>
> Josh Patten
> Assistant Network Administrator
> Brazos County IT Dept.
> (979) 361-4676
>
>
> On 7/16/2010 10:23 AM, Josh Patten wrote:
>    
>> I'm forwarding the support request I sent to Patton regarding a
>> problem with their gateways and sipX. Here is where the engineer said
>> things are going wrong:
>>
>> Line 1068, the smartnode sends BYE to polycom to ip 10.200.24.250 as
>> showed below:
>>
>> 23:39:24 SIP_TR>  [STACK]>  Stack: to 10.200.24.250
>> BYE sip:[email protected];x-sipX-nonat SIP/2.0
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.50.11:5060;branch=z9hG4bKaba231ea2aa038eb1
>> Route:
>> <sip:10.200.24.250:5060;lr;sipXecs-CallDest=LOCL;sipXecs-rs=*auth~.*from~MTRCRjc0MkYtNzZERkIzMTY$60.900_ntap*id~Mjg4ODUtNTg4NA$60$60!df02a35b10ef9ba395dee26f5cb05618>
>> Max-Forwards: 70
>> From:<sip:[email protected];user=phone>;tag=1105402544
>> To: "Josh Patten"<sip:[email protected]>;tag=14BF742F-76DFB316
>> Call-ID: [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> CSeq: 12761 BYE
>> User-Agent: Patton SN4524 JO EUI 00a0ba05061C R5.T 2010-05-20 H323 SIP
>> FXS FXO M5T SIP Stack/4.0.29.29
>> Content-Length: 0
>>
>>
>> Line 1093, Polycom answered back with message error 481 as showed below:
>>
>> 23:39:24 SIP_TR>  [STACK]<  Stack: from 10.200.24.250
>> SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.50.11:5060;branch=z9hG4bKaba231ea2aa038eb1
>> From:<sip:[email protected];user=phone>;tag=1105402544
>> To: "Josh Patten"<sip:[email protected]>;tag=14BF742F-76DFB316
>> Cseq: 12761 BYE
>> Call-Id: [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> User-Agent: PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_550-UA/3.2.2.0477
>> Accept-Language: en
>> Content-Length: 0
>> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:39:24 GMT
>>
>> Do you know why the polycom is sending this message instead to
>> terminate the call?
>>
>> I honestly don't know why that's happening. Could someone on this list
>> with a little more SIP knowledge point out where it's going wrong?
>>
>> I have attached the original debug and the original email dialog. If I
>> need to get a snapshot let me know and I will.
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject:     Re: [Support #54038]: Consultative (attended) transfer to
>> auto attendant in sipXecs causes incomplete transfer on phone
>> Date:        Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:47:06 -0500
>> From:        Josh Patten<[email protected]>
>> To:  [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> Debug is attached.
>>
>> Here is the call scenario:
>>
>> 4676 calls 95745699
>> Patton strips the 9, dialing 5745699
>> Once connected, 4676 initiates a consultative (attended) transfer to
>> 4310 which is an auto attendant
>> After connected to the auto attendant, 4676 completes the consultative
>> transfer. The call is transferred but appears to be on hold on the
>> phone. The only way to clear this ghost call is to un-hold then end
>> the call.
>> Josh Patten
>> Assistant Network Administrator
>> Brazos County IT Dept.
>> (979) 361-4676
>>
>> On 7/13/2010 2:44 PM, Patton Electronics Technical Support wrote:
>>      
>>> ====== Please reply above this line ======
>>> Hello Josh,
>>>
>>> Thanks for contacting Patton Support.
>>>
>>> Please run these debug commands via telnet and send me the output as
>>> a .txt file so we can see why the call is not being disconnected:
>>>
>>>
>>> enable
>>> show running-config
>>> show port fxo detail 5
>>> debug fxo
>>> debug ccfxo
>>> debug call-router detail 5
>>> debug call-control detail 5
>>> debug context sip-gateway transport detail 5
>>> debug context sip-gateway error detail 5
>>>
>>> I have attached a debugging tutorial for reference.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Daniel Lizaola
>>> Technical Support Engineer
>>> Patton Electronics Co
>>> 7622 Rickenbacker Drive
>>> Gaithersburg MD 20879 USA
>>> t: +1 301-975-1000
>>> f: +1 301-869-9293
>>> w: http://www.patton.com
>>>
>>> Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing
>>> this e-mail.
>>>
>>> Ticket History *Josh Patten* (Client) Posted On: 09 Jul 2010 09:54 PM
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Here is the dialing scenario laid out in the attached debug:
>>>
>>> 3001 dials 95745699
>>> Patton gateway strips 9 off and dials 5745699 on FXO hunt group
>>> Once connected, 3001 performs an attended transfer to 4310, an auto
>>> attendant, by pressing transfer then dialing 4310
>>> Once connected, 3001 presses transfer again to complete the transfer.
>>> 5745699 is transfered to the auto attendant, but the call on the
>>> transferring phone is put on hold (even though it is no longer an active
>>> call). To end this "ghost call" the user has to resume the ghost call
>>> then hang up.
>>>
>>> I have attached a debug and a copy of my configuration. Please let me
>>> know if you need anything else.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Attachments aa_debug.txt (496.75 KB)
>>> SmartNode-4524.cfg (8.64 KB)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ticket Details
>>> Ticket ID: 54038
>>> Department: Support for NA/LA/APAC
>>> Priority: Standard
>>> Status: Waiting for Response
>>>
>>>        
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>      
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to