Was this a restore/upgrade? If so did you push the profiles once the update was done?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) < [email protected]> wrote: > They are Soundpoint 450s. > The files I'm using should definitely be supported. I have used these exact > zip files on 4 other systems, so I don't see how that could be it. > I have tried this combination: > spip_ssip_BootROM_4_2_1_release_sig.zip > spip_ssip_vvx_3_1_3RevC_release_sig_split.zip > > and this combination: > spip_ssip_BootROM_4_2_2_release_sig.zip > spip_ssip_vvx_3_2_3_release_sig_split.zip > > The first one is running at my corporate office on 200 phones and 1 small > satellite office. > The second is running at 2 small satellite offices. > > The xferlog contents are below if that gives any info. > > Tue Aug 17 20:20:21 2010 1 10.81.4.249 29200 /2345-12450-001.sip.ld b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:20:26 2010 1 10.81.4.249 0 /0004f22704b2-boot.log b _ i r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:20:35 2010 1 10.81.4.249 23360 /2345-12450-001.bootrom.ld b _ > o r PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:20:41 2010 1 10.81.4.249 3234 /000000000000.cfg b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * c > Tue Aug 17 20:20:41 2010 1 10.81.4.249 29200 /2345-12450-001.sip.ld b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:20:41 2010 1 10.81.4.249 23501 /polycom_phone1.cfg b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * c > Tue Aug 17 20:20:42 2010 1 10.81.4.249 198273 /polycom_sip.cfg b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * c > Tue Aug 17 20:21:25 2010 1 10.81.4.249 29200 /2345-12450-001.bootrom.ld b _ > o r PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:21:26 2010 1 10.81.4.249 3234 /000000000000.cfg b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * c > Tue Aug 17 20:21:26 2010 1 10.81.4.249 23360 /2345-12450-001.sip.ld b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:21:31 2010 1 10.81.4.249 0 /0004f22704b2-boot.log b _ i r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:21:41 2010 1 10.81.4.249 29200 /2345-12450-001.bootrom.ld b _ > o r PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:21:46 2010 1 10.81.4.249 3234 /000000000000.cfg b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * c > Tue Aug 17 20:21:47 2010 1 10.81.4.249 29200 /2345-12450-001.sip.ld b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:21:47 2010 1 10.81.4.249 23501 /polycom_phone1.cfg b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * c > Tue Aug 17 20:21:48 2010 1 10.81.4.249 198273 /polycom_sip.cfg b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * c > Tue Aug 17 20:22:30 2010 1 10.81.4.249 29200 /2345-12450-001.bootrom.ld b _ > o r PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:22:31 2010 1 10.81.4.249 3234 /000000000000.cfg b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * c > Tue Aug 17 20:22:31 2010 1 10.81.4.249 29200 /2345-12450-001.sip.ld b _ o r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:22:36 2010 1 10.81.4.249 0 /0004f22704b2-boot.log b _ i r > PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * i > Tue Aug 17 20:22:45 2010 1 10.81.4.249 29200 /2345-12450-001.bootrom.ld b _ > o r PlcmSpIp ftp 0 * > > On 8/17/2010 3:16 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > > It usually means the bootrom or firmware that sipx is trying to load on the > phone is not supported on that model. > > You left out an important detail. Phone model. > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Wow. I think Mr. Murphy and his laws have taken up residence in my >> office today. >> Fresh (3rd time today) install of 4.2.1 on CentOS 5.5 64 Bit. >> Everything, including DNS and DHCP are running on the server. >> Any Polycom 450 handset I try gets stuck in a reboot loop. It always >> ends up on: >> config file error >> error is 0x0 >> >> I have searched for this error, and I can't find anything that even >> remotely seems to apply to me. >> >> I get one warning on the diagnostic test. I can't find a great deal of >> info on this. >> DHCP (Option 120) Test 8/17/10 2:41 PM Warning >> Unknown test result: 1 >> * Hide details >> Starting DHCP server test. >> Socket Bind Exception: Address already in use >> DHCPACK responce received. >> Message Type: DHCPACK >> Server Identifier: 10.81.4.5 >> Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 >> Router: 10.81.4.1 >> Domain Name: bartlett.voip >> DNS Server: 10.81.4.5, 127.0.0.1, 10.85.0.10 >> TFTP Server: 10.81.4.5 >> SIP Server: sipx.bartlett.voip >> NTP Server: 207.171.7.152, 66.7.96.1, 149.20.54.20 >> Starting SIP servers test. >> Testing connectivity to SIP Server: sipx.bartlett.voip >> >> >> My DHCP conf file looks the same as it does on my working servers. >> [r...@sipx tmp]# cat /etc/dhcpd.conf >> authoritative; >> ddns-update-style none; >> option sip-servers-name code 120 = text; >> >> subnet 10.81.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { >> range 10.81.4.10 10.81.4.250; >> default-lease-time 43200; >> max-lease-time 43200; >> option routers 10.81.4.1; >> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0; >> option domain-name "bartlett.voip"; >> option tftp-server-name "10.81.4.5"; >> option sip-servers-name "sipx.bartlett.voip:12000/cmcprov/login"; >> option domain-name-servers 10.81.4.5,10.85.0.10; >> option ntp-servers sipx.bartlett.voip; >> >> I have tried using both 3.2.3 and 3.1.3. I have both of these working on >> other setups. It does take whichever firmware I activate, but gets the >> same error. >> I will be glad to provide any more info, but I'm not sure where to >> start. Any ideas? >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > > > -- > ====================== > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > sip: [email protected] > Fax: 434.984.8431 > > Email: [email protected] > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > sip: [email protected] > Fax: 434.984.8427 > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ > > Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? > Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec. > > > -- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ Why do mathematicians always confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because 31 Oct = 25 Dec.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
