Let's  not exaggerate here.  Sipxbridge has not been available for a couple
of years.  From my standpoint, I use it with two different ITSP's.  It works
flawlessly, no problems, nada, zilch.

 

It amazes me the complaints that people make over products they use for
free, but have not taken the many hours to build.

 

>From my perspective, I'm grateful for what is provided.  Thanks to all the
developers that have put their hard work into this product, even if it is a
thankless job.

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael
Scheidell
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 6:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIMPLE SOLUTION FOR ITSP'S WHO SEND TO PORT 5060
Re: iptables experts: port forwarding.

 

On 8/20/10 9:47 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: 

Realize this is all because you are using an "inflexible" ITSP.
 
Siproxd is not flexible or elegant.
  

no, I am using an inflexible sip switch that uses a non-standard set of
ports.
if I was the only one, it would be different, but this has been discussed
and jira's opened up for a couple of years.

-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
> | SECNAP Network Security Corporation 

.         Certified SNORT Integrator

.         2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance

.         Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness

.         Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide

.         King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008

 

  _____  

This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrapR. 
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/

  _____  

 

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to