I'm not mike but I have tested them with patton. It works fine. I've also tested with voip.ms, but I'm not ready to rule on that yet because you need to do 20 or so pages (long faxes) to adequately test.
Your AC gateway should recognize its a fax and go to t.38, just configure the fax mode for t.38... ============================ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/ ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; Discussion list for users of sipXecs software <[email protected]> Sent: Mon Oct 11 13:42:17 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Faxing Mike, Have you tried this with your mediants? I keep getting empty faxes. I've manually configured our gateways and I seem to have something off on the t.38 side of things. Kyle On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:52 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > >?And at this point I think only DID faxing via t.38 is being addressed. > This > >?means if your provider doesn't support t.38 you will want to get trunks > from > >?one that does support it (or go through a PRI gateway). > > We use the mediant 2K with PRI's and route faxes to a fax server. I would > love to eliminate some complexities, especially if both receive and send > are > possibly coming to sipx. That would be wonderful. > > Thanks for the update and the link to keep track. > > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
