I'm not so sure it works though... On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Kumaran T <[email protected]>wrote:
> > currently checked on 4.4 > > Venkateshwaran T > > > On 8/31/2011 2:55 PM, George Niculae wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Douglas Hubler<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Kumaran T > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> IMO I though that it will take the non-numeric value will be the > >>> preferences but always the user-id will the default IM-id > >> On the surface, this looks like a neat idea, but it would create all > >> sorts of inconsistencies in the data that an admin wouldn't realize. > > Well actually I think this is the way it should work, check > > ImAccount.getDefaultImId - if user id is numeric it checks for non > > numeric aliases, though not sure why it does not happen. Is this 4.4 > > or 4.6 or both? > > > > George > > > > -- > --Regards,-- > --Venkateshwaran T-- > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- Michael Picher eZuce Director of Technical Services O.978-296-1005 X2015 M.207-956-0262 @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> www.ezuce.com
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
