On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:54:23 -0700, Todd Hodgen wrote: > Mike, we seem to be running in circles in this discussion that doesn't end.
I don't believe so. As I said early on, I'm going with the phones simply registering to our main site instead of putting a server at the remote. This thread is still full of good input for this type of setup. > The idea is to extend the sipXecs network into the > other building so it appears as one network if that meets your design > requirements. Right, and there are a few ideas on how to go about doing that in the thread. All of them add up to only two things though, remote users phones registering to a main site or remote sipx box which has a vpn connection back to the main site. > However, should you lose your internet connection, you will have phones that > are an island. You should put something at that site to provide at least > 911 coverage - like a gateway with a couple of FXO ports you can dial out > with. Audiocodes has the ability to do this, as I'm sure others do too. Yes, any remote sites would have at least one physical line. > Additionally, you could put another sipXecs box there that operates as > another node on your network, or as a separate system with system to system > networking between them. This is the stuff I've not had any experience with and is why I asked. I have a better understanding of it now. It all sounds pretty straight forward > Yes, it would be cool if pfsense could run on a Linksys box, try it on one > of your 100 boxes, I'm sure the PFsense board can help on that. Looked around and doesn't appear that would work. I doubt anyone will be working on it but would have been nice as I have so many units. Aside from it's ATA ports, small boxes like this running pfsense would be very handy. Mike _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
