except scs is not certified yet either. On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Todd Hodgen <[email protected]> wrote: > SO, with TW, nothing would keep you from saying it was an SCS 4.0 install. > It’s not like they are going to ask to look under the hood, they just want > to understand the provisioning requirements on their end, and that > documentation is in your hands for connecting it up. > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitchin > (public/usenet) > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:51 AM > > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom > > > > I just spoke with a VoIP sales rep from TW telecom. They do offer SIP > trunks, but they are currently only certified to work with Cisco Call > Manager (I'm not really familiar with the Cisco line, I think that is the > name he used). This guy didn't seem like a true hands on tech guy. He said > they had 18 other products they were in the process of certifying. The list > included Nortel SCS 3.0 and Nortel SCS 4.0. No sipXecs. I tried to explain > the lineage of the various products and that Nortel SCS didn't even exist > anymore as it was now owned by Avaya. I asked him for contact information as > to who someone from sipXecs could contact to try and explain a little better > and possible get it put on their list under the sipXecs name. I'll follow up > if I get that info. > > On 9/6/2011 8:30 AM, Scott Richesson wrote: > > FYI: > > > > I’ve had both TW Telecom and TW Cable out here soliciting me. Despite the > similar name, they are two completely separate companies. TW Telecom is > pretty much business only. TW Cable is a residential-grade company that > also has a foot in the door of business services. > > > > Scott Richesson > > Cincinnati Fan > > > > From: Philippe Laurent [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:25 AM > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom > > > > TWBC business phone service and sip = bad idea. > > > > What they provide, at least in our neck of the woods, is proprietary voip > that is then converted to analog signaling at the client end, requiring me > to use a analog to sip converter inside to get it working with sipx. We had > nothing but a year of issues, with the biggest problem being calls that > would randomly terminate. > > > > A switch to voip.ms brought satisfaction to my customer, and I've since > learned my lesson. > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Max DiOrio <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know with Asterisk, Time Warner Business Class Phones were HORRIBLE. Very > bad echo! I spent months with dozens of people in their support department > and they kept saying it isn’t them. Another local VoIP installer said that > they have nothing but trouble with TW. They ONLY hand off their lines as > analog, forcing you to get an analog gateway. They will not provide a PRI > or SIP, although they did say that SIP trunking is something they are > looking into down the road. > > > > Stay away from Time Warner at all costs with VOIP equipment. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano > Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 2:49 PM > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom > > > > The advantage I see with voip.Ms is that they have automated failover per > number. At the same time you would need to address firewall needs for each > site versus the cost for a pri gateway(s). Voip.Ms has a how to for sipx on > their wiki now. > On Monday, September 5, 2011, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> If I went with a separate ITSP, is voip.ms everyone's favorite provider >> these days? It would be two 50+ handset locations and many 6 to 10 handset >> locations. >> >> On 9/5/2011 6:01 AM, Michael Picher wrote: >> >> The data portion of their solution is typically either a Hybrid Fiber/Coax >> solution (like most of your cable modems at home) or a Dedicated Fiber >> solution with some Cisco gear at the customer prem (supports higher >> bandwidth & more services). >> Their voice solutions are either analog or PRI type hand-offs from >> gateways. As of my latest understanding they won't hand you a SIP >> connection. Most of their sales folks may not even know what SIP is even >> though that is what is handling the connection to the box they put on site. >> All they really know it as is VoIP. So, this typically requires that you >> put in gateways to connect to their gateways... Too bad because of course >> it is a waste of money and a waste of call fidelity. >> Also sometimes their signal coming off their gateways can be a little >> 'hot' and may cause a little echo. It will take a bit to find an engineer >> who understands what you are trying to tell them but they may eventually fix >> it. Most of their field techs are cable runners / box swappers. >> I wouldn't consider them a Tier 1 or 2 provider for business voice. More >> like a Tier 3. They are OK & relatively inexpensive for the small business >> space. >> From a data perspective they seem to be pretty good and certainly higher >> speed and much less expensive than throwing in T3's and such. >> Mike >> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone have any experience with sipXecs and commercial VoIP services >>> from Time Warner telecom? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> >> >> >> -- >> Michael Picher >> eZuce >> Director of Technical Services >> O.978-296-1005 >> X2015 <tel:978-296-1005%20X2015> <tel:978-296-1005 <tel:978-296-1005>%20X2015> >> M.207-956-0262 <tel:207-956-0262> <tel:207-956-0262 <tel:207-956-0262>> >> @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> >> www.ezuce.com >> >> >> > > -- > ====================== > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > sip: [email protected] > Fax: 434.465.6833 > > Email: [email protected] > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > sip: [email protected] > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://support.myitdepartment.net > > > > Blog: > > http://blog.myitdepartment.net > > > > Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 > > > > Ask about our Internet faxservices! > > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >
-- ====================== Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.465.6833 Email: [email protected] LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Contract Customers: http://support.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet faxservices! _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
