In that case, why is it being stripped? It's a valid e.164 attribute. If it is unique enough: 91+10 digits can be changed to "whatever you need to pass the call".
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Kumaran T <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > Hi Tony, > What I meant was when outside caller from mobile or landline calls the > DID number then leading + was stripped by sipxecs and display as > "919786303754".So we cannot call them back without manually adding the + or > 00...If Vm is dropped and user tries to call from "Click to call" then It > won't work because "919786303754" is not valid number(91 is not valid ISD > code..It should be +91 or 0091) > > Regards, > Kumaran T > > > On 10/14/2011 4:49 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > > What you are saying is: I need a way to call back numbers with a leading > "+". > > > http://www.myitdepartment.net/support/Three_things_I_really_like_about_sipXecs_4.pdf > > Go to the section about dialplans. > > Option: The thing to HAVE done was to simply use a dialplan rule to > discard the "+" when dialing out. Problem solved, I've done this many times. > > Option: Another option, using an SBC, is to strip the leading "+" before > it his sipx. I've done this many times. > > If you LEFT the + in the caller ID, it would have been easier to find a > match for "+"xx digits and replace "+" with "+00" and append the matching > suffix. > > In your case, "+1" and 10 digits, can be replaced with "+00" and whetever > digits need to be sent. I doubt you will have any issues. > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Venkateshwaran T < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Todd, >> Now I got the point what you are saying.Thanks for the update.So >> what do you think whether it can be like this or solution should be >> provided? >> >> Regards, >> Kumaran T >> >> On 10/14/2011 1:28 PM, Todd Hodgen wrote: >> > I understand the issue, from an engineering point, you want to resolve >> it >> > when a + is removed, in software. >> > >> > What I am saying, which may not be a solution to the issue you describe, >> but >> > is a workaround for anyone that is dealing with this issue is to create >> a >> > dial plan that for instance has 9 as the access code, and 14 digits. >> For >> > the outbound numbers, you would have it add 00 + the 14 digits to your >> > international carrier and it should go out as 00+14 digits on your >> > international trunks. >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Venkateshwaran T [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 12:47 AM >> > To: Todd Hodgen >> > Cc: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software' >> > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Outside caller without proper caller-id >> > >> > Yes,That to make outside calls.My concern is about displaying the caller >> -id >> > for outside caller.SipXecs will discard the +.So we cannot call directly >> > that number from miss call.Because the caller -id is not proper.Then we >> want >> > to enter the number with leading 00 or + followed by the number to >> call.In >> > our case number will be displayed as 919986252763.So dialing >> 919986252763 >> > won't work.. >> > >> > Either US or UK or India or Europe without leading + or 00 we can't call >> If >> > call lands from UK land line to US(sipxecs).It will display the call >> from >> > "442085431771".So if we try to make a to "442085431771".The call will >> not >> > establish.So want add 00 or + according to dial plan to call that number >> > >> > Regards, >> > Kumaran T >> > >> > >> > On 10/14/2011 12:53 PM, Todd Hodgen wrote: >> >> You should be able to create a custom dial plan to insert the 00 to >> >> make that call. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: [email protected] >> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kumaran T >> >> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 12:00 AM >> >> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >> >> Subject: [sipx-users] Outside caller without proper caller-id >> >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> When outsider caller calls or deposit a VM then leading + will be >> >> discarded and display the number like 919986252763 instead of >> >> +919986252763.The leading + symbol was discarded for fixing the issue >> >> "http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-5120".So there should some work >> >> around fix for solving the caller-id.May be double 00 can be added in >> >> the place of +.But "919986252763" is not a proper way to display the >> >> caller-id..Because we cannot make a call by dialing the number >> >> "919986252763" from outside.. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Kumaran T >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> sipx-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >> > > > > -- > ====================== > Tony Graziano, Manager > Telephone: 434.984.8430 > sip: [email protected] > Fax: 434.465.6833 > > Email: [email protected] > > LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: > Telephone: 434.984.8426 > sip: [email protected] > > Helpdesk Contract Customers: > http://support.myitdepartment.net > > Blog: > http://blog.myitdepartment.net > > Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 > > Ask about our Internet Fax services! > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
