We run in production on Citrix XenServer. But it's really more for the ability to snapshot the system when we're dog-fooding a new release. It's the only virtual on the server, 6 out of the 8 MB on that box is given to the server and 7 of the 8 processors is given to the server. Plus we usually only have about 25 concurrent users on the system...
I have been able to run a CentOS 5 / openUC 4.4.0 (commercial version of sipXecs) system in Amazon Web Services. I'm still working on this and I'm not ready to produce details on this here in the mailing list (saving some surprises for the user group meeting in March ;-) ). I also don't want users thinking that full system virtualization is ready yet (partial is though and we're doing that with some commercial customers). Thanks, Mike On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Wyland, Tony <[email protected]> wrote: > In theory if given adequate CPU and network bandwidth, sipxecs should be > able to run in vmware without notice. I know it installs and “works” in > testing but am curious if people are doing this in production and if any > unexpected issues arose.**** > > ** ** > > Tony Wyland**** > > Messiah College**** > > [email protected]**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- Michael Picher, Director of Technical Services eZuce, Inc. 300 Brickstone Square**** Suite 201**** Andover, MA. 01810 O.978-296-1005 X2015 M.207-956-0262 @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> www.ezuce.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hope to see you at the sipX CoLab! http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipx-colab A gathering for - open source users, eZuce customers & eZuce partners Get the inside track on 4.6 and a glimpse at the future sipXecs!
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
