Thanks Nate. Maybe Tony just missed Martin's offensive comment. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.
Thanks, Tim Ingalls Shared Communications, Inc. 801-618-2102 Office On 02/17/2012 09:30 PM, Nate wrote: > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Organization: SipXecs Forum > In-Reply-To:<[email protected]> > X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8<66184> > Message-ID:<[email protected]> > > > > Tim Ingalls wrote on Fri, 17 February 2012 14:05 >> -Training and docs as well as support are available very >> similar to e.g. Cisco as mentioned below, but as part of >> the commercial edition >> >> OK. But consider the fact that organic growth can be >> fueled by the open-source version. You will never get >> certain customers, because they don't need you. But in >> great numbers, they can provide market assurance that your >> solution rocks. The closer you get to mass adoption, the >> greater the perception that your commercial offerings >> rock. But you won't get to mass adoption (like Asterisk >> and it's variants have achieved) if >> nerdy-but-not-that-nerdy people like me can't understand >> quickly how to deploy sipXecs with ITSP SIP trunking. So >> it furthers your goals to make all of that documentation >> public. Great documentation = great mindshare. > > I tend to agree with Tim, and was going to post almost the > same thing, but he said it better than I would have. Would > eZuce be losing customers by making their BASIC > documentation available to the community? If yes, then is > there a way for SMBs or startups to purchase access to their > documentation? > > Tony Graziano wrote on Fri, 17 February 2012 14:15 >> I don't think any of the responses to you have been >> unprofessional, >> that was uncalled for. >> >> I'll encourage anyone reading this thread to ignore the >> poster until >> (if) he musters up some civility. > > I'm sorry but I was also thinking the comment was offensive > and unprofessional. Although I'm very impressed that the > CEO is active on a discussion such as this, I would not > expect to hear a comment like that. > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
