Hmm, I see. We will take a closer look on this then, as said only did some quick tests. Will report back when we did a few more tests. ________________________________________ From: Joegen Baclor [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 15:46 To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Cc: Henry Dogger Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22
Definitely not expected behavior. It does a very basic check in two plugins. alias and fallback. In alais, susbcribe opts out if alias relation is userforward. In fallback, it totally opts out for all subscribes. RLS routing happens in mapping rules which is never touched. On 11/15/2012 10:35 PM, Henry Dogger wrote: > Joegen, > > I did notice a slower working BLF when using the RPM you sended, it seems > sipXecs is delaying the subscribe/notify a bit. > Perhaps this is expected behavior, but just wanted to point it out :) > > Regards, > Henry > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] on behalf of Henry Dogger > [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 14:29 > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22 > > Hi Joegen, > > We have tested this (quickly) and these tests look promising. > We still want to test this a bit further, but I do not see any subscribes > getting forwarded so far. > We will report back if we have further tested this fix, good work! > > Regards, > Henry (colleague of Elwin) > Telecats BV > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] on behalf of Melcon Moraes > [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 14:21 > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Subscribe forwarding 4.4.0-update #22 > > Joegen, can you please also provide a 32bits RPM for testing? > > - > MM > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Joegen Baclor > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Elwin, > > Please test the same scenario using the attached RPM. > > Let me know. > > Joegen > > > On 10/31/2012 10:46 PM, Elwin Formsma wrote: > Hello, > > Just a quick question. Is there any specific reason why a SUBSCRIBE would > follow SipXecs call forwardings? > See attached screenshot. > > > Kind regards, > Met vriendelijke groet, > > > Elwin Formsma > Telecats BV > ----- > Elwin Formsma | Telecats bv | KvK Enschede 06069106 | Tel: 053 488 99 44 | > Fax: 053 488 99 10 | E-mail: > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> | > > > [cid:[email protected]] > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
