Hello, Joegen. On the BLF topic, I have a BLF assigned to a Hunt Group and when some member of the group is on call/receiving, the BLF shows that perfectly. Also, I was able to use the Direct Pickup(*78+extension) to pickup a ringing call form any member of the HG.
After the "upgrade"( from sipxregistry-4.4.0-459.gf9c26 to sipxregistry-4.4.0-464.g3d5d0), the SUBSCRIBE does not get forwarded to userforward anymore, as expected. As a side-effect, no more BLF and Direct Pickup for HG, since HGs have a "userforward" relation to it's members. Do you see any way around this? - MM On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]> wrote: > Melcon, > > If you can test SAA and BLF, so much the better. Regarding subscribes > getting forwarded to FS, that is something that can be augmented by the > mapping rules methodMatch. For now, I think that is benign and won't cause > any noticeable effect in traffic. > > Joegen > > > On 11/17/2012 07:19 AM, Melcon Moraes wrote: > > Hi, Joegen. > > It seems to be ok now. I've been using it all day and didn't notice any > side-effects, like the slower BLF metioned by Henry. > > Registrar now only returns the AOR and the VM in the 302, so the > SUBSCRIBE to the FS gets replied with a "405 - Method not allowed". > > Is there any specific test you would want me to perform? > > Henry, can you provide some more details about your first test you've > noticed a little delay? How many phone sets were on the system; how many > BLF subscribes? Even with the newest RPM, have you noticed the same delay? > > > Best regards. > > - > MM > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Melcon Moraes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thank you, Joegen. >> >> I'll test it and let you know the results. >> >> - >> MM >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Updated patch and RPMs. The preious RPM will only tackle susbcribe >>> not getting forwarded but will still hit fallback rules becuase of a >>> missing return statement. If you are testing dial-plans like testing if it >>> gets forwarded to sipXbridge, then you need to update the rpms. >>> >>> >>> On 11/15/2012 11:58 PM, Domenico Chierico wrote: >>> >>> what about the patch file? >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Here you go. Let me know how it goes. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/15/2012 09:21 PM, Melcon Moraes wrote: >>>> >>>> Joegen, can you please also provide a 32bits RPM for testing? >>>> >>>> - >>>> MM >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Joegen Baclor <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Elwin, >>>>> >>>>> Please test the same scenario using the attached RPM. >>>>> >>>>> Let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Joegen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10/31/2012 10:46 PM, Elwin Formsma wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Just a quick question. Is there any specific reason why a SUBSCRIBE >>>>> would follow SipXecs call forwardings? >>>>> See attached screenshot. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Met vriendelijke groet, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Elwin Formsma >>>>> Telecats BV >>>>> ----- >>>>> Elwin Formsma | Telecats bv | KvK Enschede 06069106 | Tel: 053 488 >>>>> 99 44 <053%20488%2099%2044> | Fax: 053 488 99 10<053%C2%A0488%2099%2010>| >>>>> E-mail: >>>>> [email protected] | >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sipx-users mailing [email protected] >>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sipx-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sipx-users mailing [email protected] >>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sipx-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing [email protected] >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > > >
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
