On Friday 08 July 2005 20:08, Bernard Li wrote: > > I also get the debuginfo stuff generated, I was wrong. Some > > rpmbuild macros do > > this. I disabled the check in the SPEC file for now. > > I just commented out the line in /etc/rpm/macros.prelink.
I added: # hack for ignoring unpackaged files (*debug) %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 in the spec file. > For your zlib.rul patch, I'm not convinced that you still need to set > the -fPIC after you have updated to 1.2.2 - can you test that or have > you already done so? I read your remark on this too late, will try that. I wonder whether the removal of the object files in between is still needed. > Just a note about updating the kernel version - I would imagine most (if > not all) of the kernel patches in the patches directory need to be > updated as well. Actually not. The i386 kernel was 2.6.10 and the patches were arch independent, so I just needed to rename the i386 patches (mostly related to SATA, BTW) such that they are also picked up for ia64 and x86_64. Regards, Erich ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar _______________________________________________ Sisuite-devel mailing list Sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel
