Le vendredi 3 août 2007 13:08, dann frazier a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:54:19AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:37:08PM -0400, Geoffroy Vall?e wrote:
> > >> Hi Andrea,
> > >>
> > >> I will try to have a look but Dann is definitively THE expert. I also
> > >> had to do some minor modifications for the version i have for OSCAR,
> > >> for instance to fix an installation issue in some very specific cases.
> > >> BTW if you see any problem installing/using systemimager on Debian
> > >> based systems, let me because i really would like to stabilize OSCAR
> > >> on Debian.
> > >
> > > Speaking of which - is 3.8 ready to be uploaded into unstable?
> >
> > Not yet (AFAIK). I'm working in 3.9.2, then I've in mind to backport the
> > patch in the 3.8.x branch. After that, and after a revision of an expert
> > debian maintainer :-), I think that 3.8 will be ready to be uploaded in
> > Debian unstable.
>
> Actually, what I'm talking about is the systemimager-debian repository,
> which is where we host the official source for Debian (and where
> Geoffroy contributed a lot of work a while back).
>
> Making sure the devel branch builds/works on a Debian system is
> obviously a good thing. However, the packages in Debian are still on
> 3.6 which we obviously don't want to continue shipping.
>
> I've yet to see anyone express real interest (read: submit patches) in
> helping/taking over the official packages - Geoffroy has helped a lot,
> but his primary interest is Oscar which has less rigourous
> requirements than Debian in a number of ways.
>
> Unless this changes I suppose I'll just orphan them and request their
> removal, recommending that users move to the non-Debian builds.

Dann, i did not have a lot of time to spend on systemimager-debian lately but 
be sure that i will do my best help to create a new version for unstable. 
Actually i had some weird behaviors in some very specific cases and i need to 
double-check what is the current status for that.

Regarding your point on OSCAR constraints versus Debian constraints you are 
perfectly right but if i can help in order to avoid systemimager to become 
orphan, i will do my best. What i will try to do ASAP is to create a TODO 
list of points to address in order to have acceptable debian packages for 
systemimager-3.8. 

Thanks,

-- 
Geoffroy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
sisuite-devel mailing list
sisuite-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sisuite-devel

Reply via email to