"Barry Dexter A. Gonzaga" said:
> just updated my previously submitted sites. OpenBSD Journal .site
> is very *dirty* could someone look over them?, they are quite usable
> but....
Thanks for all those sites -- I've just checked 'em in!
The OpenBSD Journal site looks OK to me -- in terms of its output anyway
:). Unfortunately I think Slash-type news sites are always going to
require some PreProcessing or PostProcessing, due to all those "more
comments" and "less comments" links, so I would not be too concerned about
that.
> i cannot checkout cvs source from sourceforge, do any of you
> have mirrors of the cvs tree? the daily snaphots have not been updated
> lately.
Strange -- it seems to work OK for me (logging in with anonymous pserver
access, as described on the sitescooper.org CVS page). What errors do you
get?
I see that the link to the sourceforge documentation has rotted, because
they moved their docs and didn't leave forwarding links. grrr. This
is now fixed. However, the commands listed on that page should still
work OK, namely:
export CVS_RSH=ssh
cvs \
-d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/sitescooper \
login
cvs -z3 \
-d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/sitescooper \
co sitescooper
(BTW setting you up as a contributor on SourceForge would be no problem,
if you're interested. It would allow you to checkin site files directly
without having to mail them on to me ;)
Also the latest snapshot at http://sitescooper.org/devel/ seems OK...
although the change logs haven't got the most recent changes (I really
must fix this ;)
--j.
_______________________________________________
Sitescooper-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sitescooper-talk
