Justin Mason wrote:
>
> The OpenBSD Journal site looks OK to me -- in terms of its output anyway
> :). Unfortunately I think Slash-type news sites are always going to
> require some PreProcessing or PostProcessing, due to all those "more
> comments" and "less comments" links, so I would not be too concerned about
> that.
further to this, has anyone had any success using Dave Raggett's "tidy"
HTML cleaner (http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/) as a preprocessor?
Can it be wedged into the SiteScooper pipeline?
It only gives up on files that are seriously broken, otherwise produces
clean, valid HTML files. Sadly, broken HTML is probably a decent %age of
the sites out there [a text markup old fart writes].
Stewart
_______________________________________________
Sitescooper-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sitescooper-talk
