On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:15 AM Laurent Bercot <ska-skaw...@skarnet.org> wrote: > Why is it so hard to do things the right way instead of looking for > technical workarounds to political problems (which never works)?
Because it's hard to tell what is right...The rule for what's right is already political(or policy) problem... > Do you do this with other packages? Because the situation for execline is too rare for me. I haven't met other software that claims the binary names which are too familiar for most people, like cd. And I'm mostly agree that binaries like cd/umask/wait are not POSIX compatible  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906250#22 So it seems to me that we can't reach a result that satisfies to both side. I hope I can refrain to package exeline, but it's a dependency of s6. However the binaries(cd, umask, wait) that cause problem are not dependency of s6. It's unfair to stop packaging s6 since that. -- Shengjing Zhu <z...@debian.org> GPG Key: 0xCF0E265B7DFBB2F2 Homepage: https://zhsj.me