Robin,
thanks for alerting Paul to my script. I should try it again with a more
recent snapshot. I think the TCP/IP interface is a great feature but I
was unable to get it working right. Maybe now with a few more interested
people we can make some progress here.
Sander
Robin Lauryssen-Mitchell wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> You may also want to take a look at Sander Pool's modified ChartList.pl
> script at http://tinyurl. <http://tinyurl.com/yulc7h
> <http://tinyurl.com/yulc7h>> com/yulc7h
>
> Robin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> <mailto:skychart-discussion%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:[email protected]
> <mailto:skychart-discussion%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Paul Rodman
> Sent: 01 May 2007 05:48
> To: [email protected]
> <mailto:skychart-discussion%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [skychart-discussion] TCP/IP interface
>
> I've been playing with the TCP/IP interface in the latest beta, with
> the hope of adding CdC V3 support to AstroPlanner. So far I have been
> able to get some stuff going, but not all.
>
> If I send SETRA, SETDEC and SETFOV they are all accepted, but the
> chart doesn't change. I assumed that you would then follow that with
> a REDRAW command in order to see the required view. However, all that
> happens is that CdC seizes up and stops responding.
>
> Is the wrong command to issue, or is it a bug?
>
> i.e. what's wrong with, say:
>
> SETRA 12.0
> SETDEC -12.0
> SETFOV 3.0
> REDRAW
>
> Paul Rodman
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
