On 2009-12-22, at 05:53, Carlo Wood wrote: > I already commented on this before imho... Yes it is possible > to run scripts that are on harddisk; although I'm not sure > you can use a part of the OS that easily to achieve it.
> Imho, you could let a script run for 1 ms (100 scripts at a time) > every 3 seconds, only using 6.4 MB of RAM that is refreshed > from disk (with 100 next scripts) every 100 ms. The reason that thrashing virtual memory is a problem is because disk I/O is a bottleneck. Adding more disk I/O is not the solution. > The talk that I see about objects being returned... I don't > know where that comes from. From the original announcement and in-world comments by Babbage Linden. > Why would you want to return objects? Because that's the simplest and most efficient and reliable way to remove scripts from memory without causing data loss. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/SLDev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
