Oops, I didn't see that part of their license page. Ok, we have to sign this contract.
As far as I understand, that's independent from the copyright header below, i.e. we could stick with "Copyright Software AG". Correct? Michael On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 20:52, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > On 2 Feb 2004, at 10:24, Michael Hartmeier wrote: > > > I want to prepare the license/copyright header in the source files to > > be donated. According to > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/ > > we should use the apache 2 license, which means the header would look > > like this: > > > > * Copyright 1999-2004 Software AG > > * > > * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); > > * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. > > * You may obtain a copy of the License at > > * > > * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > * > > * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, > > * software distributed under the License is distributed on an > > * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, > > * either express or implied. > > * See the License for the specific language governing permissions > > * and limitations under the License. > > > > I wonder about the copyright holder. Is it ok to stick with a > > Software AG copyright or do we have to transfer it to Apache Software > > Foundation? > > You have to transfer it to the ASF and you have to sign the CLA if you > haven't done so already. > > SoftwareAG still retains copyright as the original owner, but the ASF > gets a non-revocable, worldwide, permanent ability to distribute it and > make derivative copies of it. And for this, it must be given copyright. > > -- > Stefano. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
