Akil wrote: > JP, Thanks for the rest. > > As regards the following: > >>Personally, I think that indexing is a heavy task and performing it on >>each store actions through Interceptors could be very heavy. >>Scheduling indexing or reindexing for the nigth could be a good idea if >>your system is not used worldwide and does not neeed absolutly up to >>date indexes. >> >>Have you seen what is going on with slide and DASL ? >>If not have a look at org.apache.slide.search package >> >>JP >> >> > > The indexing per store action is required in a few of my potential > applications. Of course, > the amount of data coming in would be reasonable less than 1 GB a day. > Moreover the Search Engine I am using is tuned for incremental indexing, > although, of course, batch indexing is always faster. > > Yes, I have and that would be the long term plan for this project, but I > need to have this up and > running ASAP. >
If you can't wait my patch to be applied to the cvs tree, apply it yourself and send me feedback :-) JP -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
