That is my current plan.
I will get the code from the Archives. Thanks.

Does the content interceptor only get called for file nodes or also for
action and user nodes?

Akil

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Philippe Courson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Slide Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: ContentInterceptor based Content Indexer


> Akil wrote:
>
> > JP, Thanks for the rest.
> >
> > As regards the following:
> >
> >>Personally, I think that indexing is a heavy task and performing it on
> >>each store actions through Interceptors could be very heavy.
> >>Scheduling indexing or reindexing for the nigth could be a good idea if
> >>your system is not used worldwide and does not neeed absolutly up to
> >>date indexes.
> >>
> >>Have you seen what is going on with slide and DASL ?
> >>If not have a look at org.apache.slide.search package
> >>
> >>JP
> >>
> >>
> >
> > The indexing per store action is required in a few of my potential
> > applications.  Of course,
> > the amount of data coming in would be reasonable less than 1 GB a day.
> > Moreover the Search Engine I am using is tuned for incremental indexing,
> > although, of course, batch indexing is always faster.
> >
> > Yes, I have and that would be the long term plan for this project, but
I
> > need to have this up and
> > running ASAP.
> >
>
>
> If you can't wait my patch to be applied to the cvs tree, apply it
> yourself and send me feedback :-)
>
> JP
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to