| That is my current plan. | I will get the code from the Archives. Thanks. | | Does the content interceptor only get called for file nodes or also for | action and user nodes?
For nodes | Akil | | ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Jean-Philippe Courson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: "Slide Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:39 AM | Subject: Re: ContentInterceptor based Content Indexer | | | > Akil wrote: | > | > > JP, Thanks for the rest. | > > | > > As regards the following: | > > | > >>Personally, I think that indexing is a heavy task and performing it on | > >>each store actions through Interceptors could be very heavy. | > >>Scheduling indexing or reindexing for the nigth could be a good idea if | > >>your system is not used worldwide and does not neeed absolutly up to | > >>date indexes. | > >> | > >>Have you seen what is going on with slide and DASL ? | > >>If not have a look at org.apache.slide.search package | > >> | > >>JP | > >> | > >> | > > | > > The indexing per store action is required in a few of my potential | > > applications. Of course, | > > the amount of data coming in would be reasonable less than 1 GB a day. | > > Moreover the Search Engine I am using is tuned for incremental indexing, | > > although, of course, batch indexing is always faster. | > > | > > Yes, I have and that would be the long term plan for this project, but | I | > > need to have this up and | > > running ASAP. | > > | > | > | > If you can't wait my patch to be applied to the cvs tree, apply it | > yourself and send me feedback :-) | > | > JP | > | > | > | > | > | > -- | > To unsubscribe, e-mail: | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > For additional commands, e-mail: | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > | > | | | -- | To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | | -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
