Hi, On Nov 18, 2007 4:45 PM, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think a .getNode() would be much less confusing and more direct. > If someone should ever need a getItem() or even a .getRawData() > i think we could always address that later.
+1 I would even go as far as questioning the need for the Resource interface in the first place; why not use Node instead? PS. I may well be too much of a reductionist with this and the URI mapping issue. Perhaps I should start writing nanosling. Just kidding... ;-) BR, Jukka Zitting
