Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 20.11.2007, 11:11 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> >... public interface MappedResource extends Resource {
> > Object getObject();
> > }..
>
> Ok - I'd call that OcmMappedResource maybe, as "mapped" is a kinda generic
> name.
Not sure. OcmMappedResource as in
"Object-Content-Mapping-Mapped-Resource" sounds a bit weird. Almost like
PDF format, PIN number, ... In addition the term "OCM" seems to me seems
a bit too close to the concrete Jackrabbit JCR-OCM project thus
implicating a concrete implementation in an interface.
I agree that MappedResource sounds kind of generic. After all, it is an
interface and should be somewhat generic, right ?
Regards
Felix
