> I do not understand the reflection thing :-) > And also, though it looks nice having the apache feather at the lower > right corner, it covers an important part of the "g" and allows > misreading "sling" for "slina" in this case ...
:) i couldn't agree more... as i said i am just trying to help the effort of making the current proposal from a technical level more compelling. i don't even want to get started about my reservations for the current proposal in general. personally, i understand this whole excercise more as a questionable experiment or a teaching exercise rather than a serious effort to get a usable logo. as mentioned before, i think the whole exercise is a bit weird since "design by committee" always ends up with visually crippled solutions. specifically since (to my knowledge) the people on this list have no design experience or education whatsoever, to me this is a bit the blind leading the blind. regards, david On 12/2/07, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I do not understand the reflection thing :-) > > And also, though it looks nice having the apache feather at the lower > right corner, it covers an important part of the "g" and allows > misreading "sling" for "slina" in this case ... > > Regards > Felix > >
