On Dec 12, 2007 5:52 PM, Michael Marth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Re issue 1): > > we could have a 404 handler script that kicks in when a non-existing > resource is requested....
Good idea. Do you have a suggestion about how to select which 404 script to use? Assume I have dropped some scripts under /apps/foo, and I request /content/foo which does not exist. IIUC you'd want in this case to use the /apps/foo/status.404.esp script to handle this error, but how do we decide that this script is more appropriate than, say, /bar/somewhere/404.esp? We might say that we replace the first level of the pathname (/content in this case) with /apps, and use that as a starting point to look for scripts. That's a simple enough rule, but it's a bit constraining. -Bertrand
