What do people think about the suggested renaming below? Right now jcr/base has only one class, so I assume we'll want to put more stuff there over time, so maybe jcr/commons is more appropriate.
-Bertrand On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Feb 18, 2008 6:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...I think that "jcr base" is a little bit to generic. > > > What about naming it "jackrabbit-base" as it is the base for the > > jackrabbit-client and jackrabbit-server modules?... > > Agreed, or jackrabbit-commons maybe? > > -Bertrand > -- Bertrand Delacretaz http://www.codeconsult.ch
