On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... jcr/commons is fine if it's not tied to jackrabbit :) > Otherwise I would prefer a "jackrabbit" somehow in the name....
ok, so that'd be jackrabbit-base then. The RepositoryAccessor class uses some convenience classes from Jackrabbit - not sure if those are really tied to Jackrabbit vs. other JCR repositories, but it's still good to indicate that in the name. -Bertrand
