Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
What do people think about the suggested renaming below?
Right now jcr/base has only one class, so I assume we'll want to put
more stuff there over time, so maybe jcr/commons is more appropriate.
jcr/commons is fine if it's not tied to jackrabbit :)
Otherwise I would prefer a "jackrabbit" somehow in the name.
Carsten
-Bertrand
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Feb 18, 2008 6:01 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I think that "jcr base" is a little bit to generic.
What about naming it "jackrabbit-base" as it is the base for the
> jackrabbit-client and jackrabbit-server modules?...
Agreed, or jackrabbit-commons maybe?
-Bertrand
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
